close_menu
Latest News

Rachel Belle

Seattlites Resist Donating to Susan G Komen’s Race For a Cure

BERLIN (AP) -- Computers may have us beat at chess and checkers, but new research suggests our brains still have an edge when it comes to solving certain tricky problems thanks to a very human trait: intuition.

Scientists in Denmark have found that people who played a game that simulated a complex calculation in physics sometimes did better than their silicon rivals.

"The big surprise we had was that some of the players actually had solutions that were of high quality and of shorter duration than any computer algorithms could find," said Jacob Friis Sherson, a physicist at Aarhus University who co-wrote the study published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Experts say the results could advance the quest to develop effective quantum computers, something most major universities and several tech companies are working on as they seek to accelerate processing power. Such computers use individual atoms to store information and it's hoped they could one day outperform even the fastest conventional silicon-based supercomputers.

The problem that Sherson and his colleagues set out to tackle concerns the best way to control the atoms using laser beams before their quantum state is disturbed. Time is limited and the number of possibilities is vast, meaning that even advanced computers struggle to find the perfect solution.

The scientists decided to create a game called Quantum Moves , in which players had to perform essentially the same task by using their mouse to simulate the laser beams that pick up the atoms and move them around.

This approach -- known as gamification -- has been used for several years to solve other scientific problems, such as identifying types of galaxies based on their shape.

"Most of the other efforts deal with pattern recognition whereas our game is very dynamic and intuition-based," said Sherson.

The team found that players were able to outperform computers precisely because they didn't try all possible options one by one.

"One of the most distinctly human abilities is our ability to forget and to filter out information," he said. "And that's very important here because we have a problem that's just so complicated you will never be finished if you attack it systematically."

Frank Wilhelm-Mauch, a professor of theoretical physics at the University of Saarbruecken who wasn't involved in the study, said the Danish scientists had found a way to exploit the way humans intuitively find solutions to fairly complex problems by simplifying them, thereby achieving a solution that might not be as mathematically perfect as that produced by a computer but definitely more practical.

"The work looks extremely solid and the solution is totally plausible," he said.

Wilhelm-Mauch said the results of the study would likely affect the entire field of quantum computing, because similar problems exist "like sand on a beach."

The Danish scientists are hoping to build on their existing work as word of the game and its contribution to quantum physics spreads, drawing in more players.

The effort might also be seen as a response to the setbacks human players have suffered against computers in more traditional games recently. Last month AlphaGo, a program developed by Google to play the ancient strategy game Go, won 4:1 matches against humans, chalking up another major victory for artificial intelligence.

"It's slightly encouraging that there are problems where we humans are still superior to computer algorithms," said Sherson.

___

https://www.scienceathome.org


Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

By Rachel Belle

Survivor Parade with Cheryl 1

Last year, 14,000 people pinned on pink ribbons and
walked, jogged or ran in Seattle’s Susan G Komen Race For
a Cure, to raise money for breast cancer prevention and
research. This year, they’re seeing a 36 percent drop in
registration for the June 3rd race.

It was back in January when the national Susan G Komen
organization announced they were cutting grant funds to
Planned Parenthood. It was seen as a political, pro-Life
decision and the nation went into a frenzy. Three days, a
few Susan G Komen employee resignations and half a million
dollars worth of public donations to Planned Parenthood
later, Komen reversed it’s decision. But it was too late.
A lot of people, across the country, made the decision to
stop supporting Susan G Komen, and redirected their
dollars towards Planned Parenthood instead. Now, executive
director for the Puget Sound Susan G
Komen for the Cure
, Cheryl Shaw wants to set some
things straight.

“We were not a part of the decision, we were not a part
of the discussion. We were informed, as the public was
informed, of that national decision. As the public voiced
their concerns, we previously had voiced our concerns and
and had requested that the decision be changed. It was not
changed and so here we are.”

She hopes that people who have halted their donations,
and involvement with Race for a Cure, will come back
around.

“We operate independently. We do our own fundraising.
All of the funds that we raise, 75% stays here in this
community to help local women and then 25% goes to
national research, global research, to find a cure. None
of our funds go to national administration.”

I asked Cheryl if she thinks Susan G Komen should be
getting involved in politics.

“Absolutely not. Our mission is to save lives and our
focus is on the women that we serve and should always be
that way. I think what is disheartening is that decisions
that are made by individuals who are not donating to Komen
are affecting women. We see headlines about ‘Komen is
going to be hurt,’ ‘Race For A Cure’ is going to be hurt.’
Women in this community are going to be hurt. We stay
focused on the women that we serve and the mission that
this organization is all about. And that’s to save lives.”

To put it into perspective, Cheryl says a 36% drop in
participation means 30% fewer mammograms for local,
underprivileged and uninsured women.

“I’m upset. I am a survivor and I’m concerned because
with our fundraising the way it is now, I know that there
are going to be women who do not get screened early enough
in order to have treatment that they deserve. I’m
concerned and I’m also upset because I think that whenever
we make decisions on an organizational level, or an
individual level, it’s beyond us. We have to think outside
of ourselves in order to determine who, ultimately, is
impacted.”

Cheryl knows that some people are directing their money
towards other women’s health organizations, but she says
no one else focuses on breast cancer like they do.

“If they don’t come back and fund those women through
Komen, in essence, the women are still losing. That’s what
I’m very frustrated about is that we have been put in a
situation where we have to defend the fact that we serve
underserved women. We have never wavered from that, we
will never waver from that. As a survivor, as a woman who
grew up in an underserved population, as a woman of color,
this is extremely personal and it’s very important.”

Click
here
for information on how to sign up for the June 3,
2012 Race For the Cure in Seattle.

Ring My Belle on KIRO Radio

  • Tune in to KIRO Radio on weekdays at 4:33pm and 6:33pm for Ring my Belle with Rachel Belle.

Who is Rachel Belle?

  • Rachel BelleRachel Belle's "Ring My Belle" segment airs Monday-Friday on The Ron & Don Show at 4:33pm and 6:33pm. You can hear "Ring My Belle Weekends" Sundays at 3:00pm. Rachel is a northern California native who loves anything and everything culinary, playing Scrabble, petting cats and getting outside.

    Please send Rachel your story ideas, weekend events and taco truck tips!

Comments

comments powered by Disqus
close_menu
Latest News