close_menu
Latest News

Jason Rantz

Tacoma teacher who gave toy gun to student should not be suspended

BERLIN (AP) -- Computers may have us beat at chess and checkers, but new research suggests our brains still have an edge when it comes to solving certain tricky problems thanks to a very human trait: intuition.

Scientists in Denmark have found that people who played a game that simulated a complex calculation in physics sometimes did better than their silicon rivals.

"The big surprise we had was that some of the players actually had solutions that were of high quality and of shorter duration than any computer algorithms could find," said Jacob Friis Sherson, a physicist at Aarhus University who co-wrote the study published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Experts say the results could advance the quest to develop effective quantum computers, something most major universities and several tech companies are working on as they seek to accelerate processing power. Such computers use individual atoms to store information and it's hoped they could one day outperform even the fastest conventional silicon-based supercomputers.

The problem that Sherson and his colleagues set out to tackle concerns the best way to control the atoms using laser beams before their quantum state is disturbed. Time is limited and the number of possibilities is vast, meaning that even advanced computers struggle to find the perfect solution.

The scientists decided to create a game called Quantum Moves , in which players had to perform essentially the same task by using their mouse to simulate the laser beams that pick up the atoms and move them around.

This approach -- known as gamification -- has been used for several years to solve other scientific problems, such as identifying types of galaxies based on their shape.

"Most of the other efforts deal with pattern recognition whereas our game is very dynamic and intuition-based," said Sherson.

The team found that players were able to outperform computers precisely because they didn't try all possible options one by one.

"One of the most distinctly human abilities is our ability to forget and to filter out information," he said. "And that's very important here because we have a problem that's just so complicated you will never be finished if you attack it systematically."

Frank Wilhelm-Mauch, a professor of theoretical physics at the University of Saarbruecken who wasn't involved in the study, said the Danish scientists had found a way to exploit the way humans intuitively find solutions to fairly complex problems by simplifying them, thereby achieving a solution that might not be as mathematically perfect as that produced by a computer but definitely more practical.

"The work looks extremely solid and the solution is totally plausible," he said.

Wilhelm-Mauch said the results of the study would likely affect the entire field of quantum computing, because similar problems exist "like sand on a beach."

The Danish scientists are hoping to build on their existing work as word of the game and its contribution to quantum physics spreads, drawing in more players.

The effort might also be seen as a response to the setbacks human players have suffered against computers in more traditional games recently. Last month AlphaGo, a program developed by Google to play the ancient strategy game Go, won 4:1 matches against humans, chalking up another major victory for artificial intelligence.

"It's slightly encouraging that there are problems where we humans are still superior to computer algorithms," said Sherson.

___

https://www.scienceathome.org


Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Taken from Wednesday’s edition of The Jason Rantz Show.

An eighth grader in Tacoma apparently got a toy gun as a gift from his math teacher last month, and as you can imagine all hell broke loose.

KING 5 covered the story. The father of the eighth grader tells KING 5 he doesn’t allow his sons to have toy guns, so when he found a gun in his son’s bedroom, he asked him where he got it and was surprised to hear from his son that he got it in math class.

“Especially with all the gun violence in schools and across the country and everywhere, it’s totally setting the wrong example,” says Jawan Campbell, the father of the eight grader.

Campbell tells KING 5 his son would have been suspended for bringing a toy like that to school, so he thinks the teacher should face a similar penalty.

We should preface this by saying, this guy, he seems like a really good father. But his reaction to a toy gun for me seems to go a little bit overboard. We have seen across this county remarkable overreaction to children who bring toy guns to school. He made a little bit of reference to that in that story, where he told KING 5 if his son brought a toy gun to school he would be expelled.

We have seen instances of young kids who are using their fingers to pretend they have a gun and getting suspended for that. We have seen cases of students shooting little rubber bands at each other and then being suspended for using weapons in the classroom. We have seen cases of kids drawing pictures of guns and getting in trouble.

All of those instances are complete and utter overreactions. It is a reaction or a concern I can sometimes understand given the history lately of gun violence in schools. But rather than suspend or expel a student for using his finger to point at another person and pretend to shoot, why don’t you explain to that child why maybe now in 2014 after a number of high profile shootings in schools, it may not be a good idea to do that?

Why don’t you bring the kid in, sit them down, explain what they did and explain what your views are on that behavior. Doesn’t that seem like a reasonable thing to do? Especially when we’re talking about young kids who are first graders or second graders?

But we see all this overreaction. We are hypersensitive to toy guns, to fingers to drawings, to instances where reasonable people can look at what happened, can look at the incident, can look at the kid and know that there is no threat posed. No one is going to accidentally get shot by using your finger. No one will die if someone draws a picture of a gun. We overreact. And that overreaction is happening here with this teacher who might get potentially suspended because a father who is overacting is going to push for it.

Taken from Wednesday’s edition of The Jason Rantz Show.

JS

Jason Rantz on KIRO Radio 97.3 FM

  • Tune in to KIRO Radio weeknights at 7pm for The Jason Rantz Show.

Comments

comments powered by Disqus
close_menu
Latest News